Jointly published by Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria (formerly Anambra State University) and Klamidas.com e-ISSN 3043-6729 Global Online Journal of Academic Research (GOJAR), Vol. 3, No. 3, June 2024. https://klamidas.com/gojar-v3n3-2024-02/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
The Calling of the Twelve by Jesus in Matthew 4:18-22: A Reflection of the Concept of OMO AWO in Yoruba Traditional Religion By Oghenekevwe Kate Jibromah, Ajishola Omojeje, Elijah Rotimi Ashafa & Jonah Olusola Adeniran Abstract Continuity is a fundamental essence of every religion. The leadership of every religious group in the world realizes the importance of transmitting the ethics, values and norms of their belief system from one generation to another. Such intergenerational transmissions rest upon the continuous zeal and devotion of the adherents of each religion. One of the important aspects of the Yoruba Traditional Religion is the practice of initiation into the secrets of Ifa divination after a period of apprenticeship during which all apprentices are known as Omo Awo. Essentially disciples or followers, the Omo Awo constitute a common phenomenon that runs through religious practices of the people. Omo Awo are trained under the Adahunse, Babalawo or the Onisegun. They are trained to understand the secret and practice of Ifa divination which would enable them to serve as custodians of Yoruba traditional religious thought and practices after their initiation. They continue as trusted custodians of affairs pertaining to the gods and attend to the people’s spiritual needs after the demise of their masters. Against this background, this paper examines the calling of the twelve disciples of Jesus in Matthew 4:18-22 in juxtaposition with the requirements and stipulations entailed in the process of selecting the Omo Awo in Traditional Yoruba Religion. The paper employed comparative, historical and contextual methods of investigation. Research materials were drawn from primary and secondary sources, published and unpublished data, as well as from oral interviews conducted with identified resource persons vastly knowledgeable in the art of traditional medicine. In the light of its findings, the paper concluded that there is an urgent need to advocate for more Omo Awo in the practice of Yoruba Traditional Religion. Keywords: Omo Awo, disciples, religion, tradition, Yoruba
Introduction Different religions across the world have sustained their beliefs and practices and ensured continuity by transmitting their ethics, values and norms from one generation to another. Hence, discipleship or apprenticeship, designed to train and install devoted adherents who will carry the religious system into the future, is an integral programme of every religious order as it is the surest way of guaranteeing intergenerational survival. The paper, using historical and analytical methods of investigation, undertakes a study of the apprenticeship practices of Yoruba Traditional Religion’s Omo Awo in relation to Jesus’ call of His first disciples as chronicled in Matthew 4:18-22. It has been noted that by examining various religious beliefs, customs, rituals, and approaches, we gain a better and deeper understanding of different religious groups and communities, thereby enhancing our appreciation of similarities and differences between diverse religious persuasions and practices. In addition, being acquainted with the ways of different religious traditions grants a useful insight into how each group has been able to create and sustain a unique worldview by which their adherents give their lives meaning and transcendental value. This is a comparative exposition that examines discipleship recruitment and practices as they relate to two different religious traditions: Yoruba Traditional Religion’s concept of Omo Awo and the Call of Jesus’ disciples as recorded in Matthew 4:18-22. This is not a theological comparison but rather an academic study of the apprenticeship approaches employed by the two belief systems. As emphasized by The Encyclopedia of Religion (2005): Unlike theology, the academic study of religion seeks to provide accounts of the world’s religions from perspectives that have no confessional (religious) ground or agenda. As an empirical pursuit, it is concerned with understanding and explaining what people actually think and do without establishing or enforcing norms for that thought and behavior” (p. 8761) Lambe (2021), underscoring the importance of such relative investigation, states that “The academic study of religion is an ideal way to explore religious ideas from a variety of perspectives… Researching religion means having the chance to learn how others understand existence and our purpose.” Theoretical Framework The conceptual framework adopted for this study is the comparative method, as proposed by Oliver Freiberger (2018). In his “Elements of a Comparative Methodology in the Study of Religion”, Freiberger emphasized the need for a “a methodological frame of comparison that addresses both the general configuration of a comparative study—its goal, mode, scale, and scope—and the comparative process, distinguishing operations of selection, description, juxtaposition, redescription, as well as rectification and theory formation” (Freiberger 2018). Freiberger identified two broad goals in the study of religion, namely description and classification. He distinguishes these two goals and their corresponding modes as follows: A comparative study whose primary goal is description aims at a better understanding of a particular historical-empirical item by means of comparison. Comparing that item with other items can serve a heuristic purpose by identifying aspects and facets that would otherwise be missed or neglected. It can produce insights by de-familiarizing the familiar… This goal corresponds to the illuminative mode of comparison… Second, a study whose primary goal is classification uses comparison to form, apply, critically evaluate, and refine metalinguistic terminology in order to classify religious phenomena. This goal corresponds to the taxonomic mode of comparison. While it seems useful to separate these two general goals analytically, they can certainly complement each other, even within a single study (Freiberger 2018). In the context of Freiberger’s framework, this paper is essentially descriptive and illuminative, and the main comparative operation adopted for the study is juxtaposition. Because the Omo Awo phenomenon, while fairly well-known in traditional Yoruba communities, is not a well-known practice among non-Yoruba speaking audience, this study will allocate greater scope to explaining aspects of the Omo Awo custom than to description of Christian discipleship principles and practices. System of Discipleship in Christianity A disciple in Christianity is a follower of Christ, that is, someone who believes and practices the tenets taught by Christ in the gospels and carried on, after His earthly life, by His initial disciples. Discipleship in Christianity continued after Christ’s death and resurrection through the activities of those who had interacted with him physically, as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles (who were chiefly Jesus’ first twelve disciples and the distinguished convert, Paul) and the epistles (collection of letters written to early Christian groups and communities by some Apostles and pioneer Christian leaders). Training was a key element Jesus used in developing His followers, and the main instrument he deployed in doing so was teaching. He taught them His principles on different occasions; in Matthew 5:1-2, it is on record that Jesus’ “disciples came unto him: And he opened his mouth, and taught them”. William (1911) enumerated the number of times Jesus was called the Teacher in the Gospels (that is, the record of His ministry as narrated by four of His disciples). According to Williams: In the Synoptic Gospels the title Teacher is applied to Jesus thirty-nine times, twelve each in Mark and Matthew, fifteen in Luke. In the Fourth Gospel it is used six times to designate Jesus. That is, forty-five times in the four Gospels Jesus is called the Teacher. In studying the above passages more closely we observe that they can be divided into three classes: First, those in which Jesus is called the Teacher by Himself: Mt. 10:24, 25; Lk. 6:40; Jno. 13:14 – six in all; Secondly, those in which He is called the Teacher by those friendly to him, including the Twelve and His other followers and sympathizers. There are twenty-three instances where those friendly to Him call Him the teacher, ten of which are cases in which the Twelve call Him the teacher. (p. 63) Teaching the word of God as revealed To Him was a crucial tool Jesus used to train His disciples; His disciples spread and continue to spread His doctrine through teaching the principles and practices of Jesus and those of His earliest disciples as recorded in the Bible. So, teaching and mentorship are crucial tools of discipleship in Christianity. System of Discipleship in Yoruba Traditional Religion According to Olupona (2022), “At the core of Yorùbá religious thought and practice is the idea and practice of secrecy called awo.” The practice being referred to here, as indicated by Olupona, is “Ifa divination practice” whose “custodians…and masters of the sacred exoteric tradition” are the Babalawo. The Babalawo is someone who has been initiated into Ifa after completing a minimum of five years apprenticeship under the tutelage of Olúwo. During these years of training, Ifa apprentices are called Ọmọ-Àwo. As a matter of fact, there will never be Ọmọ-Àwo without Awo and Babaláwo and vis-à-vis just like there will never be student without school and the teacher. Therefore to get a clearer picture of who the Ọmọ-Àwo is, it is necessary to understand the term Awo. Awo is an institutionalized process that trains its students in the school of life, the philosophy, ethics, morals, science and technology of life, through the instrumentality of IFÁ principles and divination system. The institution requires high moral value, maturity, discipline in words and character. Babaláwo is a product of the institution called Awo. The word, Babaláwo, is etymologically derived from bàbà (master) in Awo – institution of acquiring Yorùbá body of knowledge, which Ifá (the Yoruba deity of wisdom) represent in totality. Hence, Babaláwo means master in the working knowledge of Ifa, acquired in the institution called Awo. There can never be a Babaláwo without the institution called Awo. However, it is important to know that the term Babaláwo has nothing to do with being a father, but being a master in the act and knowledge that is accessible in the institution of Awo. There are many young boys, who are not yet married, but are experts in the art of divination and traditional healing therapy; some have also become pharmacopoeial – highly knowledgeable about therapeutical plants and healing system. This succinctly explains the Yorùbá metaphorical aphorism that, “Baba ni baba yóò máa jẹ́ lọ́jọ́ kọ́jọ́.” which means, “A professional will always be professional, come rain or shine.” Awo is the institution which trains and imbues its students, the Ọmọ Awo, with the basic and deeper bodies of knowledge in the skills of writing (marking of Odù on Ìyẹ̀re òsùn) and in reading, reciting, divining, philosophy, ethics, music, herbal medicine, and other Yorùbá-oriented science. After such students are certified as competent in learning and character by their teacher, whom the system gives the appellation of ‘Oluawo’, they are certificated with the title of ‘Babaláwo’ (an expert in the art of divination and traditional healing system). During the learning process, the institution expects an Ọmọ awo to be submissive and accept the knowledge passed to him or her by his master, the Oluawo, without arguing. Hence, the saying, “májiyàn la fi awodá“, that is, knowledge is better acquired where there is absence of rancour. In the same vein, a trained and competent Babaláwo is also expected to know when to talk and when not to talk. He or she must learn not to divulge the secret of his or her client, and possibly his colleagues. That is the basis of the statement, “Wíwoniẹnuawo ń wo”, which means that a Babaláwo should be able to keep a sealed lip on issues which concern his clients and colleagues. In addition, a trained Babaláwo should not be self-centered but should help his colleagues when the need arises. Refusing to act at such times, to protect the glory of the institution, will not only bring ridicule to his colleagues but will also bring the institution to disrepute in the public domain. Hence, our ancestors said, “awoní ń gbé awoní ìgbọ̀wọ́, bí awokò bá gbé awoní ìgbọ̀wọ̀, awo atẹ́, awo a sì fàya. That is, united we stand but in division we fall. In summary, Awo is about an institution through which diverse fields of Yoruba body of knowledge are learnt by the Ọmọ awo; the product of such an institution is referred to as Baba Aláwo which, in Western parlance, could be interpreted as the father of the initiates. A babaláwo is also another name for a person who is an Ifá priest. He is the one who has the knowledge of divination and can identify the 16 sets of Ifa which is known as Odù as well as the signatures of their sub sets which is always arranged in chapters and verses. Stages and Processes of Ifá Learning The stages of the Ifá Learning system could be divided into three, with each stage having a number of processes. The three stages are:
The Early Stage of Ifá Learning The early stage of Ifa learning is sub-divided into six processes to reflect the level or degree of knowledge acquired by the Ọmọ awo in the course of his or her training. Below are the six processes of this stage.
Middle Stage of Ifá Learning The following processes make up the middle stage of Ifá learning:
Final Stage of Ifá Learning The final stage involves the following ten processes:
Juxtaposing the Concept of Omo Awo with the Call of the First Four of the Twelve Disciples by Jesus Christ Jesus’ call of the first four of His twelve disciples is recorded as follows in Matthew 4:18-22 (RSV): Matt 4:18 As he walked by the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers, Simon who is called Peter and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea; for they were fishermen. Matt 4:19 And he said to them, ‘Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.’ Matt 4:20 Immediately they left their nets and followed him. Matt 4:21 As he went from there, he saw two other brothers, James son of Zebedee and his brother John, in the boat with their father Zebedee, mending their nets, and he called them. Matt 4:22 Immediately they left the boat and their father, and followed him. In Jesus’ calling of the first four disciples, there is a process of discernment. He most likely saw other people but chose to call Peter and Andrew, James and John, all of whom ended up playing great roles in His ministry. Jesus discerned and called those who were worthy of being a part of the new consciousness – that is, “the kingdom of heaven”. Those were retained and given spiritual sustenance (Rev. Ed, 2010). This also is reflected in Ifa corpus. Ifa decides who trains as an Omo Awo, for it is not just anybody that is destined to be an Omo Awo; there are those who are called for such purpose. The call of the disciples is rooted in the call of Jesus, and this call is to change their lives forever and redirect them to a higher cause of serving others (Heusel, 2017). Jesus called them to follow him; he invited them to leave their ordinary life of catching fish and follow him to experience a new life of faith and a life of godly mission (Triton World Center). The aim or purpose of Jesus’ call is to teach the disciples to be like him. The same model is reflected in the call of the Omo Awo – he or she is called and trained by the Oluawo who teaches the Omo Awo to understand and practise divination like him. In the context of the book of Matthew, a disciple is one who has an experience of Jesus through a continuous encounter with him and who is in a position to convincingly tell others about Jesus. The Matthew account, therefore, attributes to the disciples a function that prefigures and alters their responsibility as co-workers in Jesus’ mission of preaching and asserting the kingdom of God which He represents. Awo and Babalawo, which signify the institution and the product of its learning process rooted in Isese Yoruba dynamics of wisdom, can be said to be equivalent to the pattern of Jesus’ call of His twelve disciples. Just as Jesus’ disciple must devote his entire life to follow the Lord whom he accepts as his master, train as His student, and study His word, so the Omo Awo, who is apprenticed to the Oluawo, must follow the precepts and examples of the Oluawo during the period of apprenticeship or mentorship. Eventually, the Omo Awo will be able to do everything the master does and at the end becomes the master of the custom and tradition of the people. The traditional priest is an important social figure. As a result of his training, the priest becomes the repository of the customs, knowledge, taboos, theology and even history of the society. This extensive knowledge qualifies him to act as political head, judge and ritual expert. He is very prominent at the installation of kings and chiefs. Traditional priests are men and women of integrity and of respectable disposition. As Mbiti puts it, “They are trustworthy, devout, and obedient to the traditions of their office and to God or the divinities that they serve: friendly, kind, ‘educated’ in matters of their profession and religions”. Conclusion This study has shown that in spite of differences between different religious persuasions and practices, they share certain conceptual and operational similarities. This study, to a significant extent, has shown that there is a reflection of the concept of OMO AWO in Yoruba Traditional Religion in the calling of the first four of the twelve disciples by Jesus, as narrated in Matthew 4:18-22. In both cases, mentorship and tutorial processes are involved, as the disciple or spiritual apprentice is called to be and do like his master, and to continue his work even after he has passed on. Recommendation To prolong the practice of Ifa divination system, which is a cultural, spiritual and intellectual heritage of the Yoruba as well as a UNESCO intangible cultural heritage of humanity, more youthful apprentices should be trained to carry on the work of the mostly aged persons currently sustaining the tradition by serving as Babalawo. References Abimbola, W. 1968. Ijinle Ohun EnuIfa Apa Kiini. Glasgow: Wim Collins and Co. Ltd. Abimbola, W. 1977. Awon Oju Odu Mereerindinlogun. London: Oxford. Abimbola, W. 1973. The Literature of Ifa Cults. In Biobaku, S. O. ed. 1973, Sources of Yoruba History. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Adeoye, C.L. 1979. Asaati Ise Yoruba. London: Oxford University Press. Awolalu, O. 1979. Yoruba Beliefs and Sacrificial Rites. U.K: Longman Groups Ltd. Freiberger, O. (2018). Elements of a Comparative Methodology in the Study of Religion. Religions 2018, 9(2), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/re l9020038 Heusel, P. (2017). Sacred Space (1999-2021). Jones, L., Eliade, M., & Charles, J. Encyclopedia of Religion. Macmillan Reference USA, Detroit, 2005. Lambe, E. (2021). Cited in https://www.rhodes.edu/acade mics/majors-minors/religious-studies/why-study-religion#:~: text=The%20academic% 20study%20of%20religion,under stand%20existence%20and%20our%20purpose. Lucas, O.1948. The Religion of the Yoruba. Lagos. Naseri, C.N. (2010) Discipleship in Luke 19:28-40. A Challenge to Contemporary Christians. KOINONIA, Vol. 4 (2) 1-20. Ogunranti, J. I. 2012. Itanati Asa Yoruba. Ibadan: Alafas Nigeria Company. Ogunremi, D. and Adediran, B. (Eds.). 1998. Culture and Society in Yorubaland, Ibadan: Rex Charles Publication. Ogunsakin, P. 1979. Ondo: The People, Their Custom and Traditions Lagos: Inway Publishers. Olupona, J.K. 1992. Kingship and Religion in A Nigerian Community: A Phenomenological Study of Ondo Yoruba Festivals, Ibadan: Layday. Olupona, J. K. (2022). AWO –The Nature and Essence of Secrecy in Yorùbá Religious Traditions: Conversations with IFÁ Diviners 1. In H. B. Urban & P. C. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Religion and Secrecy. Routledge. Williams, C. B. (1911). Jesus as a Teacher. Review & Expositor, 8(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373 1100800105. Yusuf, A. K. (2019). m.facebook.m Accessed 11 February, 2020.
|
||||||||||||||||||||